The People’s Pledge is a campaign that brings you together with others in your constituency to demand your MP supports an EU referendum.

EU referendum: A fair question?

Posted: May 27th, 2015 | Author: | Filed under: Campaign News, Conservative Party, Government, Parliament | Comments Off

Tomorrow, the government will publish its EU Referendum Bill, paving the way for an in-out EU vote by the end of 2017.

There is speculation that the referendum question will be amended from the one proposed in the previous Bill and that it will leave the ‘out’ campaign as the ‘no’ side.

Such a formula would be contrary to referendum precedent and expose the government to charges of trying to fix the question to favour its ‘in’ campaign.

———————————————————————————————————————————————-

Speculation is growing today that the question in the government’s EU Referendum Bill, due to be published tomorrow, will be the following:

 

“Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union?”

 

The question proposed in the original private member’s referendum bill from 2013-14 was:

 

“Do you think that the United Kingdom should be a member of the European Union?”

 

The shift in wording is in response to an Electoral Commission study conducted at the time of previous EU Referendum Bill debates. This study concluded that starting the referendum question with “Should” would clarify that the question is decisive and make it more to the point – and that use of “remain”, rather than “be”, would clarify that the UK is already a member of the EU.

 

However, proposing this formula would expose the government to charges of attempting to fix the question to force the ‘out’ campaign onto the defensive, since making the change option the ‘no’ campaign constitutes a significant break with previous referendum precedent.

 

The vast majority of past British referendums since 1997 have set the precedent that the change option on the ballot paper should invite a ‘yes’ response. The only time voters have been asked to endorse a change by voting ‘no’ was the original 1975 Common Market referendum. Recent examples of change inviting a ‘yes’ vote include:

 

“Do you think that Scotland should be an independent country?”

 

“Do you want the United Kingdom to adopt the ‘alternative vote’ system instead of the current ‘first past the post’ system for electing Members of Parliament to the House of Commons?”

 

In March 2011, the people of Wales were asked:
“Do you want the Assembly now to be able to make laws on all matters in the 20 subject areas it has powers for?”

 

In the 2004 vote on having an elected North-East assembly the question was:
“Should there be an elected assembly for the North-East region?”

 

In 1998, Londoners were asked:
“Do you want a Mayor for London?”

 

There is therefore a legitimate question to answer as to why the government plans to turn this well established pattern on its head for the EU Referendum Bill. According to precedent, and indeed common use of language when offering change, a Yes/No question formulation for the EU referendum should be:

 

“Should the United Kingdom leave the European Union?” 

 

Neutral alternative

 

In its recent study, the Electoral Commission responded to this precedent issue – which was raised solely (page 19) by the anti-EU campaign The Democracy Movement – by recommending additionally a second, non- ‘yes/no’, question formula.

 

This alternative method of presenting voters with two opposing statements has been used in some previous referendums. For example, in the 1997 test of public opinion on Scottish devolution, those participating were given the following options:

 

“I agree [I do not agree] that there should be a Scottish Parliament.”

 

For the EU referendum, the Electoral Commission’s study recommended (page 28) that “Parliament should consider very carefully whether it wishes to retain the approach of a referendum question which uses ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ as response options, taking into account the risk of a perception of bias which might be associated with question wordings set out in Recommendations 1″.

 

Concluding, the EC’s second recommended question was therefore:

 

“Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?
- Remain a member of the European Union
- Leave the European Union”

 

The EC’s study appeared to favour this non- ‘yes/no’ formula, saying (para 4.14, page 24) that: “question wordings using ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ as response options (the approach of the proposed referendum question) would not be able to fully resolve these complex issues [of neutrality]“, going on to say that whether to move away from a yes/no formulation was therefore “an important decision for Parliament”.

 

Additionally, this formulation was approved by the House of Lords in response to an amendment by crossbench peer Lord Armstrong of Ilminster, during the Lords Committee Stage of the original EU Referendum Bill on 24 January 2014 (page 11, House of Commons Library briefing – pdf).

 

Comment

 

The People’s Pledge is non-partisan on whether Britain should stay in, or leave, the European Union. Our unique, cross-party and multi-faceted campaign has, since 2011, played a leading role in pushing an in-out EU vote to the top of the political agenda – effecting change long before UKIP returned more recently to prominence.

 

Commenting on the likely referendum question wording, People’s Pledge co-founder Stuart Coster said:

 

“David Cameron has made the right decision on the franchise for the EU referendum. It is extremely ironic to see those who, until a few weeks ago, opposed anyone at all having a say on EU membership now insisting that
16-17 year olds must be allowed to vote.

 

“But when it comes to the question, referendum precedent is that the change option, in this case leaving the EU, should invite a ‘yes’ response. Breaking with that established pattern to assert the opposite would expose the government to charges of trying to disadvantage its opponents in the ‘out’ campaign on the basis that it is counter-intuitive to force a campaign for change to be negative. 

 

“The recent Scottish independence vote, the referendum on our voting system, and major devolution votes in Wales, London and over a North East Assembly all invited those seeking change to vote ‘yes’.

 

“The last time a referendum question made those seeking change the ‘no’ campaign was the original European Community vote in 1975.

 

“To be seen as acting fairly to both sides the government must either reverse the question so that voters would opt for ‘yes’ if they wish Britain to leave the EU or select the Electoral Commission’s second recommended question offering alternative responses to simply ‘yes’ or ‘no’.

 

“The danger for the government is that a referendum in which those in power are seen trying to use their privileged position to disadvantage their opponents may end up settling little.” 

 

—————————————————————————————————————————————————–

For the latest campaign news, please follow us on Twitter or add us as a friend on Facebook (sign in required) – and if you haven’t done so already, please sign the People’s Pledge today to help us get the support of MPs across all parties for an EU referendum.


EU referendum: Miliband -vs- democracy

Posted: March 30th, 2015 | Author: | Filed under: Business, Campaign News, Labour Party, News, The People's Pledge Blog | Comments Off

Ed Miliband EU referendumEd Miliband has today revealed a disturbing disdain for democracy.

In a speech to launch his party’s business manifesto on the first day of the general election campaign, his message on an EU referendum boiled down to ‘My view on EU membership means you can’t have a say’.  

A far from appealing start to his bid for Britain’s votes – writes People’s Pledge co-founder Stuart Coster

———————————————————————————

Labour party leader Ed Miliband has today kicked off his party’s general election campaign by repeating his refusal to guarantee an EU referendum.

 

While Mr Miliband believes Britain should stay in the EU, his refusal he said was based on the “risk of EU exit”. In other words, after a referendum campaign and debate, people might disagree with him so mustn’t get the chance to vote.

 

A very alarming attitude to democracy.

 

Mr Miliband then ‘banged on’ about the consequences of Britain leaving the EU, which is only one option offered by a referendum. For someone who clearly believes the case for EU membership is so strong, he strangely couldn’t conceive of the idea that people might well believe him, vote to stay in and Britain’s interminable EU debate finally ended for a generation.

 

Finally, he scaremongered about a referendum causing uncertainty for investment decisions – a myth that has already been demolished by the fact that inward investment increased at records levels in the year following David Cameron’s pledge to hold an in-out EU vote.

 

Last March, Mr Miliband said that a future Labour government would back an in/out referendum on EU membership – but only IF it is proposed that new powers are transferred from Britain to the EU. He then went to town accusing his Conservative rivals of selecting an arbitrary 2017 date for their referendum promise, while overlooking his own policy contained an even more arbitrary wait for a scenario he admitted was “unlikely in the next Parliament”.

 

Mr Miliband’s speech today was billed as Labour’s big offering to business, except that a clear majority of businesses back an EU referendum. The British Chambers of Commerce and the Institute of Directors have both backed an EU vote, the BCC poll showing by 77% of 4,000 businesses surveyed. The CBI is sometimes quoted as opposing an EU referendum, but since its leadership hasn’t dared to poll members on the question its narrow corporate stance is currently just the personal view of a handful of top apparatchiks.

 

Counter-productively, we’re left with even more contradictions and questions than answers with which people can make an informed decision about where to cast their vote in a little over a month’s time.

 

Five EU referendum questions for Ed Miliband & Labour candidates:

 

1. Why is it necessary to wait arbitrarily for new EU power transfers to be proposed before deciding about the
last 40 years of changes to our EU membership? Doesn’t this just make it clear that you’re seeking to kick the
issue into the long grass and actually avoid giving people a say?

 

2. Why is it “playing political games” to vote in a referendum on how Britain is governed by the EU, yet you don’t seem to take the same view about voting in an election on which party governs Britain? A contradiction, surely?

 

3. Couldn’t your entire case against holding an EU referendum, based as it is on opposition to one particular
outcome, also be made against holding a general election – and where does that leave your commitment to
democracy?

 

4. Isn’t the EU referendum policy you set out today neatly shooting yourself in both feet: refusing to grant a democratic exercise that a majority clearly wants, and justifying that refusal by assuming your views on EU membership will end up at odds with the majority? Democratically dubious and signalling lack of courage of your convictions; could there be a worse election proposition?

 

5. Why do you think your current and former front-bench colleagues like Steve McCabe, Jon Cruddas, Ian Austin,
Tom Watson, Gerry Sutcliffe and Tom Harris, together with senior former ministers like Keith Vaz and
Andrew Smith, plus numerous other Labour MPs like John Mann, George Howarth, Rosie Cooper, Natascha Engel,
John Cryer and more all disagree with you and have all come out in support of a clear pledge to consult
people on EU membership?

 

Ahead of 7th May, let’s hope journos start pressing Ed Miliband and other leading Labour figures for some clear answers on these points. Press your local Labour parliamentary candidate for answers too.

 

As we set out above, more than 30 Labour MPs – many pro-EU – are backing an EU vote. But when it comes to a potential prime minister, what’s clear so far is that Ed Miliband does not understand the democratic case for an EU referendum and is not serious about giving people a proper debate and vote on the EU’s role in how we are governed.

 

—————————————————————————————————————————————————–

For the latest campaign news, please follow us on Twitter or add us as a friend on Facebook (sign in required) – and if you haven’t done so already, please sign the People’s Pledge today to help us get the support of MPs across all parties for an EU referendum.


Lib Dems kill EU Referendum Bill

Posted: October 29th, 2014 | Author: | Filed under: Campaign News, Liberal Democrats, News, Parliament, The People's Pledge Blog | 1 Comment »

Bob Neill MP has accused Lib Dems of ‘killing off’ his EU Referendum Bill with “procedural games”.

Nick Clegg has refused to agree to the Bill being given a government ‘money resolution’, which it needs to progress.

Despite having once called for a “Real referendum on Europe”, the Lib Dems have now blocked putting such a vote into law.

————————————————————————

Just two weeks after the EU Referendum Bill received its latest vote of overwhelming support from MPs, late yesterday its sponsor Bob Neill MP revealed that his Bill has been ‘killed off’ by the Lib Dems in subsequent back-room “procedural games”.

 

It appears that the Lib Dems have refused to grant a government ‘money resolution’ for the EU Referendum Bill, which is required for its further passage through Parliament.

 

A money resolution can only be tabled by a government minister and, within the coalition, that requires Lib Dem approval. Without one, a Bill cannot be approved by Parliament.

 

False comparison

 

The Lib Dem attempt at justification for their money resolution veto is that the Conservatives have refused a similar resolution for a potentially vastly more expensive and much more controversial Bill being proposed by the Lib Dem MP Andrew George.

 

Just two weeks ago the EU Referendum Bill was approved unanimously by MPs by 283 votes to zero, in line with the
77% of businesses and overwhelming majority of the public that numerous polls have shown want an in-out vote on EU membership. Further, during its previous consideration by MPs last year, the Bill was passed by 304 votes to zero at its Second Reading and unopposed without a vote at its Third.

 


In comparison, Andrew George MP’s Affordable Homes Bill last month passed its Second Reading with a majority of
just 75
, its popularity with the wider public is unknown and its cost is estimated at more than ten times that of an EU referendum.

 

The Lib Dems are not making a reasonable and equitable comparison between the two Bills and so it is very hard to avoid the conclusion that they are using their own MP’s Bill as an excuse to block this greater chance
of an EU referendum being held
.

 

Referendum realities

 

Beyond the inevitable party squabbles about who said what behind closed doors, the basic fact is that the Lib Dems did not obstruct a money resolution for the EU Referendum Bill last year, but they have this year – when there was a far greater chance of the Bill becoming law.

 

Many who are already unenamoured with Westminster will be even more dismayed by the evident horse-trading that the Lib Dems are holding up as their supposed justification for blocking this legal commitment to an EU vote.

 

Reading the coverage these events have received, it’s very hard to avoid the conclusion that the Lib Dems are shamefully playing games with these Bills, drawing false equivalence between them to try to justify blocking us all being given a say on EU membership.

 

It has been evident for some time that, in stark contrast with the principles portrayed by his own party’s name, Nick Clegg in particular is desperate to prevent an EU referendum taking place.

 

Only one Liberal Democrat MP turned up for the EU Referendum Bill’s Second Reading on 17th October, and that was the Birmingham Yardley MP John Hemming. He attended the debate to support the Bill – the only Lib Dem MP to do so.

 

If an EU referendum will not now be written into law, the People’s Pledge will instead throw its resources and energies particularly into the most marginal constituencies to ensure voters know which of their candidates for parliament next May will trust them to decide on EU membership and which will not.

 

With the next general election in the balance, making sure a majority of MPs still back an EU referendum after that May election must now become our main goal, by taking the case for an EU vote to cities, towns and streets across the country in the run up to next May’s general election.

 

Please help us to keep fighting and to thwart Nick Clegg’s continuing efforts to block an EU referendum by today making a donation to our campaign fund. Together, we can make sure we are finally consulted on whether Britain should stay in, or leave, the European Union.

 

 

 

 

Thank you for your support.

 

—————————————————————————————————————————————————–

For the latest campaign news, please follow us on Twitter or add us as a friend on Facebook (sign in required) – and if you haven’t done so already, please sign the People’s Pledge today to help us get the support of all parties for an EU referendum.


283 votes to zero – MPs back EU Referendum Bill

Posted: October 24th, 2014 | Author: | Filed under: Campaign News, Conservative Party, Labour Party, Liberal Democrats, Parliament, The People's Pledge Blog, Uncategorized | Comments Off


MPs have once again voted unanimously to approve the revived EU Referendum Bill, this time being presented by the Bromley & Chislehurst MP Bob Neill.

At its Second Reading, the Bill was passed by 283 votes in favour to zero against, though it must still pass further stages and votes to become law.

If ultimately successful, this Bill will write into law that an EU referendum must be held by the end of 2017.

———————————————————————————

Friday’s debate and vote on the European Union (Referendum) Bill has now been published in the House of Commons record Hansard (17 October 2014 : Column 565).

 

This Private Member’s Bill, Bob Neill MP this time taking over from James Wharton as its sponsor, sets out that a referendum on the UK’s membership of the European Union “must be held before 31 December 2017″.

 

Once again, despite a number of MPs standing up during the debate to criticise the Bill – chiefly to make misleading and diversionary points about the outcome of such a referendum, rather than address the principle of giving people a choice -  not one single MP dared to vote against it.

 

The vote listing shows that 283 MPs voted to approve the EU Referendum Bill, with the breakdown by party as follows:

Read the rest of this entry »


EU Referendum Bill returns THIS Friday

Posted: October 14th, 2014 | Author: | Filed under: Campaign News, Parliament, The People's Pledge Blog | Comments Off

This Friday, the EU Referendum Bill will return to parliament – and this time, with your help, it has an even better chance of becoming law.

This vital Bill would commit whichever party wins next year’s general election to hold an in/out EU referendum by the end of 2017. If you want a say on Britain’s membership of the EU, this Bill can make a real difference.

So join in: follow our guide below to send a quick message to your MP and urge them to Back the Bill this Friday ~ writes People’s Pledge co-founder Stuart Coster.

———————————————————————————

This Friday, 17th October 2014, the EU Referendum Bill will return to parliament – and this time, with your help, it has an even better chance of becoming law.

 

This vital Private Member’s Bill would commit whichever party wins the 2015 general election to hold an in/out EU referendum by the end of 2017.  To block that referendum, a new government would be forced to pass a new law repealing this EU Referendum Act. Politically, that would be a very difficult task.

 

That’s why, if you want a say on Britain’s membership of the EU, this Bill can make a real difference. But the Bill needs your support once again to help it succeed.

Read the rest of this entry »


Ed Miliband’s EU referendum mistake

Posted: May 29th, 2014 | Author: | Filed under: Campaign News, Conservative Party, Labour Party, The People's Pledge Blog | Comments Off


The problem now for Ed Miliband is: without an EU referendum guarantee, what can he offer that stands a chance of attracting disenchanted voters back to Labour?

Between now and May 2015 the People’s Pledge will be making it clear to voters across the country which of their candidates for parliament trusts them to decide on Britain’s EU membership ~ writes campaign co-founder Stuart Coster.

———————————————————————————

Of all the places to pick in which to make his ‘election response’ speech, billed as aiming to rebuild trust after recent mixed results for Labour at the polls, Ed Miliband chose the Essex town of Thurrock.

 

This is the constituency that, back in April 2012, voted 89% in support of an EU referendum when we in the People’s Pledge kicked off our grassroots campaign for an in-out EU vote.

 

More than 30% of Thurrock voters took part in the postal ballot, administered independently by Electoral Reform Services, putting the consultation on a par with election turnouts.

 

So it was hardly an auspicious start to a bid to reconnect with disenchanted voters  – certainly in this town, nor indeed nationally where polls show a significant majority want a say on EU membership – for Ed Miliband to rock up with the news that an EU referendum still isn’t his priority.

 

When it comes to an election voters perceive matters, Ukip’s appeal as a protest will undoubtedly be reduced. Further, EU critics tempted towards Ukip who recognise that securing a referendum is the only way to potentially change Britain’s relationship with the EU will be torn away to a likely governing party that promises to deliver one. Recent polling by Lord Ashcroft suggests that, next year, at least a half of the recent Ukip vote could be up for grabs.

 

Labour was of course far from alone in feeling the squeeze in the past few weeks, but David Cameron at least has his referendum pledge to help bring a crucial number of those voters back into his fold.

 

The problem now for Ed Miliband is; what can he offer that stands a chance of attracting some of this disenchanted group back to Labour?

 

From the questions fired at Mr Miliband after Tuesday’s speech, even senior local Labour figures can’t understand why the party responsible for our original EEC referendum of nearly 40 years and 5 treaties ago won’t also today commit to consulting people again.

 

John Kent, the ousted Labour leader of Thurrock council, told BBC Essex that the lack of a referendum pledge was a key mistake and a fellow Labour councillor stood up to tell Ed that he was repeatedly tackled about the issue on the doorstep, being asked ‘Why will you not trust us?’.

 

In unfortunate contradiction with the stated purpose of the event, Ed gave all this the brush off. Yet such sentiments also align with the views of the 28 Labour MPs so far on record as backing an EU vote. This list includes shadow cabinet members Steve McCabe and Jon Cruddas, former Miliband frontbenchers Tom Harris, Tom Watson, Gerry Sutcliffe and Ian Austin, together with ex-ministers Keith Vaz, Andrew Smith and Frank Field.

 

Miliband’s counter-stance – that an arbitrary wait is better than an ‘arbitrary date’ – is one that no doubt looked clever within the Westminster bubble. Outside, it just appears designed to dodge the concerns of a large majority by kicking an EU referendum into the long grass.

 

Many in Westminster also still fool themselves that the EU issue isn’t influential in people’s voting decisions, despite a referendum also clearly impacting on critical questions of trust. According to YouGov polling in March, voters in fact rank the EU as a more important issue than housing, transport, education, crime and tax.

 

Even more frustrating about Ed Miliband’s refusal to back an EU vote is the lack of recognition of how it could solve his current problems. A referendum pledge could neutralise the immigration issue, liberate floating pro-referendum voters from backing the Conservatives next year and, most importantly, send the signal that Labour wants to hear people’s views.

 

Having guaranteed an EU referendum, it’s also hard to see why Labour need fear holding it. Ukip’s 27.5% share of the vote even at such heights of hype ought to give pro-Europeans confidence that a referendum is eminently winnable for ‘In’.

 

Yet, Ed Miliband seems intent on his terrible current strategy and, while David Cameron will be hoping his own pledge delivers, Nigel Farage also needs to choose his next steps carefully. For him there’s a huge danger that he and Ukip could actually end up being remembered as the people who scuppered everyone’s chance to vote on EU membership.

 

We will keep encouraging an opening of minds and a burgeoning trust among leading Labour figures, but alongside we are also building our records of where all parliamentary candidates stand on an EU referendum, particularly in key marginal seats. Our goal has always been to secure in the next parliament a cross-party majority of referendum supporters. Between now and May 2015 we will be making it clear to voters across the country which of their candidates for parliament trusts them to decide on Britain’s EU membership.

 

This article was first published on Politics.co.uk

—————————————————————————————————————————————————–

For the latest campaign news, please follow us on Twitter or add us as a friend on Facebook (sign in required) – and if you haven’t done so already, please sign the People’s Pledge today to help us get the support of all parties for an EU referendum.

 


Ed Miliband pledges an “unlikely” EU referendum

Posted: March 12th, 2014 | Author: | Filed under: Labour Party, The People's Pledge Blog | 2 Comments »

Labour party leader Ed Miliband has today given a speech outlining his party’s policy on EU membership and a referendum.

He has said that Labour would go slightly further than the government’s EU ‘referendum lock’ legislation, but an ‘in/out’ referendum would still depend on a new transfer of powers from Britain to Brussels being proposed – a scenario he himself admits is “unlikely”.

———————————————————————————

Ed Miliband has today announced that a future Labour government would back “an in/out referendum” on EU membership – but only IF it is proposed that new powers are transferred from Britain to the EU.

 

Despite backing the idea of consulting people should parliament decide to give up further powers to the EU, he has ruled out giving us a vote on the significant powers already passed to the EU over the past 40 years of UK membership.

 

Highlighting the change over the government’s existing ‘referendum lock’ legislation, Mr Miliband said that this vote “would not just be a referendum on the narrow question of whether to allow a transfer of powers from Britain to Brussels”.

 

The Labour leader first shifted towards keeping the government’s ‘referendum lock’ back in January 2013 and his stance outlined today brings his policy into line with the Liberal Democrats’ most recent position on an EU vote.

 

However, Mr Miliband’s support for a referendum still depends, arbitrarily, on a new transfer of powers from Britain to Brussels being proposed – a scenario that he himself admits “is unlikely there will be any such proposals in the next parliament”.

Read the rest of this entry »


Success! MPs approve EU Referendum Bill

Posted: November 29th, 2013 | Author: | Filed under: Campaign News, Parliament, The People's Pledge Blog | Comments Off

Houses of ParliamentMPs have today approved the EU Referendum Bill.

Backed unopposed, without a final vote, the Bill will next year move on to the House of Lords – where it faces an even tougher test to become law.

But securing the backing of MPs for the Bill is a significant achievement – notable for not one MP daring to vote against an EU referendum at the Bill’s important Second and Third Readings.

———————————————————————————

We are very pleased to report that MPs have today approved James
Wharton MP’s EU Referendum Bill.

 

Backed unopposed, without a final vote, the Bill will now be sent to the House of Lords with the clear endorsement of the people’s chamber.

 

The Bill will, however, face potentially an even tougher test in the Lords, since it is even harder there to prevent a Private Member’s Bill running out of time.

 

But securing the approval of the House of Commons for the EU Referendum Bill is a significant achievement.

Read the rest of this entry »


Labour veteran urges Miliband to back EU vote

Posted: September 23rd, 2013 | Author: | Filed under: Uncategorized | Comments Off

Veteran Labour former shadow cabinet member and
1992 party leadership contender Bryan Gould has urged
Ed Miliband to back an EU referendum.

His intervention comes amid growing calls from senior Labour figures past and present for Ed Miliband to
pledge to give people a say on Britain’s future relationship
with the European Union.

 

———————————————————————————

Ed Miliband must “listen” to the people he wishes to represent and pledge to hold an in-out referendum on Britain’s membership of the European Union, according to a veteran former Labour shadow cabinet member and party leadership contender.

 

Bryan Gould, a member of Neil Kinnock’s shadow cabinet from 1986-1992 and contender against John Smith for the leadership of the Labour party, urged Ed Miliband to “go with it” on an EU referendum and challenged the Labour leader to explain “what can go wrong?”.

 

Speaking at an event hosted by the People’s Pledge EU referendum campaign and Blackwell’s Books to introduce his new book Myths, Politicians and Money, Gould argued that a referendum vote would either resolve the issue for the “foreseeable future” or enable politicians to respond to public concerns about the EU by “securing a renegotiation of the arrangements, perhaps a departure from the European Union”.

Read the rest of this entry »


MPs give unanimous backing to EU Referendum Bill

Posted: July 8th, 2013 | Author: | Filed under: Campaign News, News, Parliament, The People's Pledge Blog | Comments Off

On Friday, MPs voted unanimously to approve James Wharton’s Private Member’s Bill for an EU referendum. The Bill was approved at its 2nd Reading by 304 votes in favour to zero against. If successful, this Bill will take an EU referendum out of the unreliable realm of political promises and into law.

———————————————————————————

Friday’s debate and vote on the EU Referendum Bill has now been published in the House of Commons record Hansard (5 July 2013 : Column 1169).

 

The one page Private Member’s Bill, presented by James Wharton MP, set out that a referendum on the United Kingdom’s membership of the European Union “must be held before 31 December 2017″.

 

The vote listing shows that, including tellers (MPs who count the votes), 306 MPs voted to approve the EU Referendum Bill. The breakdown by party is as follows:

 

295 Conservatives
6      Labour
5      Democratic Unionists

 

The six Labour MPs supporting the Bill were Roger Godsiff, Kate Hoey, Kelvin Hopkins, Dennis Skinner, Graham Stringer and Gisela Stuart.

 

There were also two Conservative tellers who acted for the opposing side in order to enable a vote to take place, despite being “strong supporters of the Bill” – as Peter Luff MP made clear during the debate.

Read the rest of this entry »